Towards a General Definition of Modeling

dc.creatorPodnieks, Karlis
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-02T03:36:16Z
dc.date.available2013-09-02T03:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-02
dc.descriptionWhat is a model? Surprisingly, in philosophical texts, this question is asked (sometimes), but almost never – answered. Instead of a general answer, usually, some classification of models is considered. The broadest possible definition of modeling could sound as follows: a model is anything that is (or could be) used, for some purpose, in place of something else. If the purpose is “answering questions”, then one has a cognitive model. Could such a broad definition be useful? Isn't it empty? Can one derive useful consequences from it? I'm trying to show that there is a lot of them.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttp://scireprints.lu.lv/155/1/Podnieks_General_Definition_of_Modeling.pdf
dc.identifierPodnieks, Karlis Towards a General Definition of Modeling. [Scientific Manuscript] (Unpublished)
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/1767
dc.language.isolaven_US
dc.relationhttp://scireprints.lu.lv/155/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)
dc.titleTowards a General Definition of Modeling
dc.typeScientific Manuscript
dc.typeNonPeerReviewed
Files
Collections