Mitoloģiskais koncepts krievu un latviešu folkloras valodā
Date
2012
Authors
Aleksandrovska, Marija
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Abstract
MITOLOĢISKAIS KONCEPTS
KRIEVU UN LATVIEŠU FOLKLORAS VALODĀ
ANOTĀCIJA
Promocijas darbs „Mitoloģiskais koncepts krievu un latviešu folkloras valodā” ir
veltīts krievu un latviešu mitoloģisko konceptu, tādu kā krievu домовой / latviešu mājas
gars, krievu водяной / latviešu ūdens gars, krievu леший / latviešu meža gars, krievu
ведьма / latviešu ragana, krievu колдун / latviešu burvis, krievu черт / latviešu velns
izpētei. Darba mērķis ir izpētīt konceptu teorijas aspektā minētos mitologēmiskos vārdus, kā
arī folkloras valodā sastopamos mitoloģiskos priekšstatus, izstrādājot tādu pētniecisko
procedūru sistēmu, kas ļauj noteikt mitoloģisko konceptu apraksta leksikogrāfiskos principus
mitoloģisko konceptu vārdnīcā.
Krievu (slāvu) mitoloģisko konceptu izpēte sastatījumā ar latviešu mitoloģiskajiem
konceptiem ir īpaši aktuāla latviešu lingvistiskās tradīcijas attīstībai, pirmkārt, tāpēc, ka
Latvijā konceptu teorijas jomā veikto pētījumu ir ļoti nedaudz, un tādēļ šis pētījums var
būt ieguldījums attiecīgās teorijas plašākai izplatībai un attīstībai Latvijas zinātnē.
Otrkārt, kaut arī slāvu un baltu valodas, kultūras un priekšstati salīdzinošā aspektā ir ne
vienu vien reizi aprakstīti, līdz šim nav veikti pētījumi, kas būtu veltīti krievu un
latviešu mitoloģisko konceptu salīdzinošam aprakstam.
Tāpēc promocijas pētījuma aktualitāti nosaka, pirmkārt, mūsdienu valodniecībai
raksturīgā interese par nacionālās mentalitātes izpausmēm valodā, otrkārt, slāvu un baltu
mitoloģisko konceptu nepietiekamā izpēte un, treškārt, vajadzība pēc mitoloģisko
priekšstatu aprakstam piemērotu principu izstrādes konceptu vārdnīcā.
Pētījuma autore uzskata, ka starp krievu un latviešu mitoloģiskajiem konceptiem
nav ievērojamu atšķirību – konceptu kodolu un pamata līmeni lielākoties veido līdzīgie
jēdzieniskie komponenti, tomēr atšķirības var būt reģistrētas perifēriskā līmenī. Hipotēzi
par krievu un latviešu mitoloģisko konceptu kopējo konceptuālo lauku ilustrē īpaši
izstrādātais baltu un slāvu mitoloģisko konceptu vārdnīcas modelis, kas, pateicoties savai
struktūrai, norāda lasītājam pētāmo konceptu kopīgos saturiskos komponentus un palīdz
uztvert visus aprakstāmos konceptus kā vienotu makrostruktūru.
Kā liecina pētījuma rezultāti, mitoloģiskie koncepti jāpēta īpaši, jo konceptuālā
analīze ļauj ne vien ieraudzīt līdzīgo un atšķirīgo, kas raksturīgs slāvu un baltu kultūrām
un apziņai, kā arī sabiedrībā pieņemtajām vērtībām, bet arī aprakstīt krievu un latviešu
valodas runātāju lingvistiskos pamatpriekšstatus, kas veidojušies nacionālā pasaules
redzējuma un pasaules uztveres iespaidā.
Mythological Concept in the Language of Russian and Latvian Folklore SUMMARY The promotional paper "Mythological Concept in the Language of Russian and Latvian Folklore" investigates Russian and Latvian mythological concepts such as Rus. домовой / Lat. mājas gars [house spirit], Rus. водяной / Lat. ūdens gars [water spirit], Rus. леший / Lat. meža gars [wood spirit], Rus. ведьма / Lat. ragana [witch], Rus. колдун / Lat. burvis [wizzard], Rus. черт / Lat. velns [devil]. The aim of the paper is to investigate the abovementioned mythologemic words, as well as mythological perceptions encountered in the language of folklore from the point of view of the concept theory and to develop a system of research procedures aimed at identifying a lexicographic framework for describing mythological concepts in a dictionary of mythological concepts. Comparative research on Russian (Slavic) and Latvian mythological concepts is topical for the development of Latvian linguistics, primarily because there has been but little research work in the field of concept theory in Latvia and, therefore, this paper may contribute to a broader spread and development of this theory in Latvian science. Secondly, even though Slavic and Baltic languages, cultures and perceptions have been described in a comparative aspect before, there has been no research focused on a comparative description of Russian and Latvian mythological concepts. Therefore the topicality of the promotional paper is based, firstly, on the current interest of contemporary linguistics in manifestations of the national mindset in language; secondly, on the perceived need to study Slavic and Baltic mythological concepts; and, thirdly, the need for developing a framework for describing mythological concepts in a concept dictionary. The author holds the view that there are no substantial differences between Russian and Latvian mythological concepts – the nucleus and the base of the concepts mostly consist of similar conceptual components; however, differences may be recorded on the periphery. The hypothesis about the common conceptual area of Russian and Latvian mythological concepts may be illustrated by designing a Baltic and Slavic mythological dictionary model, which due to its structure would bring to the reader's attention the shared components of content and help perceive the concepts described as a single macrostructure. As evidenced by the results of the research, mythological concepts require detailed investigation, since conceptual analysis not only enables to see the similarities and differences in Slavic and Baltic cultures and mindsets, as well as their societal values, but helps to describe the primitive linguistic perceptions of Russian and Latvian native speakers that have formed under the influence of national world vision and perception.
Mythological Concept in the Language of Russian and Latvian Folklore SUMMARY The promotional paper "Mythological Concept in the Language of Russian and Latvian Folklore" investigates Russian and Latvian mythological concepts such as Rus. домовой / Lat. mājas gars [house spirit], Rus. водяной / Lat. ūdens gars [water spirit], Rus. леший / Lat. meža gars [wood spirit], Rus. ведьма / Lat. ragana [witch], Rus. колдун / Lat. burvis [wizzard], Rus. черт / Lat. velns [devil]. The aim of the paper is to investigate the abovementioned mythologemic words, as well as mythological perceptions encountered in the language of folklore from the point of view of the concept theory and to develop a system of research procedures aimed at identifying a lexicographic framework for describing mythological concepts in a dictionary of mythological concepts. Comparative research on Russian (Slavic) and Latvian mythological concepts is topical for the development of Latvian linguistics, primarily because there has been but little research work in the field of concept theory in Latvia and, therefore, this paper may contribute to a broader spread and development of this theory in Latvian science. Secondly, even though Slavic and Baltic languages, cultures and perceptions have been described in a comparative aspect before, there has been no research focused on a comparative description of Russian and Latvian mythological concepts. Therefore the topicality of the promotional paper is based, firstly, on the current interest of contemporary linguistics in manifestations of the national mindset in language; secondly, on the perceived need to study Slavic and Baltic mythological concepts; and, thirdly, the need for developing a framework for describing mythological concepts in a concept dictionary. The author holds the view that there are no substantial differences between Russian and Latvian mythological concepts – the nucleus and the base of the concepts mostly consist of similar conceptual components; however, differences may be recorded on the periphery. The hypothesis about the common conceptual area of Russian and Latvian mythological concepts may be illustrated by designing a Baltic and Slavic mythological dictionary model, which due to its structure would bring to the reader's attention the shared components of content and help perceive the concepts described as a single macrostructure. As evidenced by the results of the research, mythological concepts require detailed investigation, since conceptual analysis not only enables to see the similarities and differences in Slavic and Baltic cultures and mindsets, as well as their societal values, but helps to describe the primitive linguistic perceptions of Russian and Latvian native speakers that have formed under the influence of national world vision and perception.
Description
Elektroniskā versija nesatur pielikumus
Keywords
Valodniecība , Valodu un kultūras studijas, dzimtās valodas studijas un valodu programmas