Towards a General Definition of Modeling
dc.contributor.author | Podnieks, Karlis | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-04T10:16:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-04T10:16:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11-24 | |
dc.description.abstract | What is a model? Surprisingly, in philosophical texts, this question is asked (sometimes), but almost never – answered. Instead of a general answer, usually, some classification of models is considered. The broadest possible definition of modeling could sound as follows: a model is anything that is (or could be) used, for some purpose, in place of something else. If the purpose is “answering questions”, then one has a cognitive model. Could such a broad definition be useful? Isn't it empty? Can one derive useful consequences from it? I'm trying to show that there is a lot of them. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/38264 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Research Subject Categories::HUMANITIES and RELIGION | en_US |
dc.subject | models | en_US |
dc.subject | modeling | en_US |
dc.subject | model template | en_US |
dc.subject | Dappled World | en_US |
dc.title | Towards a General Definition of Modeling | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint | en_US |