Hipertekstualitāte V.Peļevina romānā "Chapajev i pustota"
Date
2006
Authors
Smirnova, Marianna
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Latvijas Universitāte
Abstract
Bakalaura darba galvenā tēma ir hipertekstuālās saistības V.Peļevina romānā “Chapajev I Pustota”. Pateicoties to realizācijai autoram paralēli sižeta līnijas attīstībai izdodas radīt aizraujošu spēli, kuras mērķis ir agrīno teksta slāņu meklēšana un atminēšana. Šādā veidā Peļevins ievērojami paplašina sava romāna robežas.
Kritiķi romāna “Chapajev I Pustota” hipertekstualitāti parasti piemin tikai garāmejot, turklāt “plaģiāta” kontekstā. Bez tiešiem pierādījumiem tiek norādīts tas, ka Peļevins hipertekstualitāti izmantojis kā aizguvumu aizguvuma pēc. Dotais darbs pierāda pretējo. Pētījuma mērķis ir hipertekstuālo saistību meklējumi romānā, to esamības pierādīšana, kā arī analīze un salīdzinājums ar atbilstošiem avotiem. Tā rezultātā šo darbu var uzskatīt par ieguldījumu romāna hipertekstuālo saistību izpētē.
The theme of this bachelor paper is hypertextuality in the novel of V. Pelevin “Chapaev i Pustota”. Due to its realization the writer, in parallel with development of a subject line, manages to construct a fascinating game of solving and searching of early text layers. As the result, Pelevin considerably expands the borders of the novel. As a rule, critics rarely mention hypertextuality in the novel “Chapaev i Pustota”, they frequently mention plagiarism in a context; without any direct proofs they specify that Pelevin uses hypertextuality as borrowing for the sake of borrowing. The given work proves the opposite. The main purpose of the research is to find hypertextuality in the novel, to prove its existence, to analyse and compare it with appropriate sources. As the result, the given work may be considered a contribution to the study of hypertextuality in the novel.
The theme of this bachelor paper is hypertextuality in the novel of V. Pelevin “Chapaev i Pustota”. Due to its realization the writer, in parallel with development of a subject line, manages to construct a fascinating game of solving and searching of early text layers. As the result, Pelevin considerably expands the borders of the novel. As a rule, critics rarely mention hypertextuality in the novel “Chapaev i Pustota”, they frequently mention plagiarism in a context; without any direct proofs they specify that Pelevin uses hypertextuality as borrowing for the sake of borrowing. The given work proves the opposite. The main purpose of the research is to find hypertextuality in the novel, to prove its existence, to analyse and compare it with appropriate sources. As the result, the given work may be considered a contribution to the study of hypertextuality in the novel.
Description
Keywords
Krievu filoloģija