An analysis of the liability rule in Latvia in case of a transfer of an undertaking in the context of freedom of contract principle

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorRatniece, Laura
dc.contributor.authorŠļujeva, Kristīne
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Lawen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T10:04:17Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T10:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this Thesis is to answer whether Article 20 of the Commercial Law of Latvia is compatible with freedom of contract principle. Chapter 1 analyzes the limitation put on freedom of contract principle in case of a transfer of an undertaking set in Article 20 and the purpose of such limitation. Chapter 2 analyzes the way freedom of contract principle manifests in contemporary legal framework, both in Latvian normative acts and European Contract Law. Thesis concludes that Article 20 is incompatible with freedom of contract principle. Considering that freedom of contract, while a component of fundamental, is not an absolute right, the existence of the limitation on freedom of contract principle in Article 20 does not itself make Article 20 incompatible with freedom of contract principle.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/48917
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Private law::Commercial and company lawen_US
dc.subjectLatviaen_US
dc.subjectContract lawen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of the liability rule in Latvia in case of a transfer of an undertaking in the context of freedom of contract principleen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Slujeva_Kristine.pdf
Size:
781.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
RJA Maģistra darbi / RGSL Master's Thesis